Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  79 / 230 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 79 / 230 Next Page
Page Background

TO HIS SPEECHWRITER

115

EISENHOWER, DWIGHT D. Group of 12 typed letters, including one Signed

in full as President, some Signed “D.E.” as President, some with secretarial signature

(“D.E.”), to his speechwriter Emmet J. Hughes, thanking him for his various supportive

efforts.Together 15 pages, 8vo or 4to,White House stationery; some with paperclip impres-

sion, horizontal folds.Two with the original envelope. (TFC) Vp, 1954-59

[4,000/6,000]

17 August 1956: “. . .If by any chance

this speech is not delivered, as written, to

the Convention, I am most certainly

going to plagiarize the parts that are not

quotes from former talks. In the half

dozen or so speeches that I have to make

this fall, I can already see dreariness

developing that will make my blood pres-

sure rise to astronomical heights. . . .

22 May 1957: “Again I am confronted

with the inadequacy of my words in try-

ing to express my appreciation of your

willingness to spend Monday and

Tuesday inWashington. I literally do not

know how we could have been able to

whip the speech last night into shape

without your help. . . .”

20 November 1958: “. . . I do not

believe that any such effort should be

couched specifically in the terms of a free-

dom-communist struggle. Rather I believe

it should be an effort of an affirmative

kind because of a conviction that we have

been woefully neglecting the field in

which the democracies and, indeed, all

civilizations based upon a religious faith,

should be particularly strong. We have

been tending too much toward the mater-

ial. We have too much thought of bombs and machines and gadgets as the arsenal of our national

and cultural strength. . . .The great problem is to get people—our own people and our friends—to

understand these things and to think on them objectively and with a sense of inspiration and uplift. . . .”

31 October 1959: “. . .There is only one clause in your letter to which I seriously object, because it

shows a misconception on your part. It reads ‘. . . the spirit and the direction of foreign policy as con-

ceived and executived [sic] by the Department of State over these years.’ The basic conception and

direction of foreign policy is my responsibility and not one of any other Department or individual.”

WITH

—retained copy of a two-page letter from Hughes to the President, warning him of the publica-

tion of his forth-coming book entitled,

America the Vincible,

which Hughes expects Eisenhower

“will neither approve of, nor concur with.” NewYork, 22 October 1959.

These letters present the trajectory of their friendship, which eventually came to an end upon the

release of Hughes’ book,

The Ordeal of Power,

in 1961.