Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  143 / 230 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 143 / 230 Next Page
Page Background

MANAGEMENT OFTHEWAR “IS A

PRIVATE WILSONIAN PARTISAN STRUGGLE”

198

TAFT, WILLIAM H. Typed Letter Signed, “WmHTaft,” to NAACP President

Moorfield Storey, thanking for a copy of his letter to [Oswald Garrison?]Villard, expressing

approval about the proposed awarding of a medal to Hawkins, explaining that he suffers

only from discouragement about the conduct of Wilson’s war. 1 page, 4to, personal sta-

tionery, with integral blank; horizontal fold. (TFC)

New Haven, 22 January 1918

[250/350]

. . . [T]hank you for sending me a copy of your letter to Mr. Villard. I . . . made some

inquiries about Hawkins.They seem to me to show that he is a man worthy of receiving the

medal . . . .

. . . I am not suffering from a lack of coal or Federal orders curtailing my activities, except so

far as one may suffer from discouragement over the conduct of the war, on the theory that it is a

private Wilsonian partisan struggle, in which no one but partisan Wilsonian Democrats and

Progressives have any concern except to pay the price.”

SUPPORTINGTHE LEAGUE OF NATIONS EVEN

AS OTHER REPUBLICANS HATE HIM FOR IT

199

TAFT,WILLIAM HOWARD.Typed Letter Signed, “WmHTaft,” toYale classmate

Howard C. Hollister (“My dear Hol”), relating news concerning friends and relations

including [James] Protus Pigott,Aaron Ferris,“Fanny” [Frances Louise Taft], Horace [Dunn

Taft], “Charley” [Charles Phelps Taft], “Annie” [Anna Sinton Taft], Maria Herron, “Bob”

[Robert A. Taft], Martha [Bowers Taft], etc., and expressing hope that Congress would

adopt the Covenant of the League of Nations. 1

1

/

2

pages, 4to, personal stationery, written

on rectos of two sheets; folds.With the original envelope. (TFC)

Pointe-au-Pic [Canada], 13 July 1919

[400/600]

. . . The fight over the League of Nations is bitter, but I anticipate that the League will be

adopted. I hope that only a few reservations will be required . . . .The personal and partisan

bitterness which the Republican Senators have displayed toward Wilson, I don’t think has

helped the Republican party. The Senators I think hate me now nearly as much as they do

Wilson. So indeed do all the Republican machine members.While it is not entirely comfortable

to be hated, it is better to be hated for pursuing the right course than it is to be despised for pur-

suing a wrong one. . . .”

199