Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  136 / 230 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 136 / 230 Next Page
Page Background

THE “BEATEN PARTY”:“WE STAND UNFLINCHINGLY BY OUR PRINCIPLES”

188

ROOSEVELT,THEODORE.Typed Letter Signed, with a few holograph correc-

tions, to Edwin A.Van Valkenburg (“Dear Van”), outlining his strategy for the Progressive

Party after the dismal results of the 1914 Congressional elections. 2 pages, 4to, personal sta-

tionery, written on two sheets; horizontal folds, faint edge toning, minor paper clip staining

at upper left. (TFC)

NewYork, 23 November 1914

[2,000/3,000]

. . . [I]f the meeting is held, all that should be done should be an announcement that we stand

unflinchingly by our principles and will never abandon them, that we stand for the entire Progressive

platform and that events during the past two years have made it clear beyond possibility of doubt that

the social and economic measures we have advocated are entirely right and that, for example, the only

possible way of satisfactorily solving the tariff and trust questions will be the methods we have outlined

and that . . . with the adoption of these methods should go the adoption of Women’s Compensation

and Child Labor laws.

As a matter of fact, what we now say is of very small consequence. Immediately after an election is a

poor time for the beaten party to expect to be listened to . . . . A year hence it may be that our words

will carry great weight, and then we will be pointing out what has been done . . . . I personally like

[George] Record and [Amos] Pinchot and I should treat them with all possible courtesy but I would

also frankly say that in view of their attitude we are bound to feel that all they are anxious to do is to

damage the Progressive party . . . . [Pinchot] says that we have lost by not being radical enough. As

we have lost not to the Democrats but to Penrose and Barnes, this statement is equivalent to saying

that people, because they thought we were not radical enough, turned and voted for . . . the ultra-con-

servatives and reactionaries everywhere. Such a statement is too nonsensical to discuss and we dignify

Amos Pinchot needlessly by giving the slightest heed to his antics.”

Published in

Letters of Theodore Roosevelt

, ed. Morison, vol. 7.